Hydrologic order: practices and institutions in Mendoza, Argentina

Paula Cecilia Mussetta Orcid
Published: Jun 1, 2014


Section : Artículos

Main Article Content

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article addresses the territory of water resource management and proposes an analytical framework to study the inter-institutional relationships and practices of the stakeholders affected by the actions taken by those institutions. It explores in a preliminary and descriptive form some of the categories presented in the framework proposed for the specific case of Mendoza, Argentina. It identifies a double working dynamic in the hydrologic regime: one between the hydrologic authorities and large-scale and powerful stakeholders of the wine industry and another dynamic between a series of non-hydrologic satellite entities and small-scale producers. This leads to a hydrologic policy that reproduces a production model that clearly benefits one sector at the expense of another.
Keywords:
water institutions stakeholders performance

Metrícas

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Mussetta, P. C. (2014). Hydrologic order: practices and institutions in Mendoza, Argentina. Revista Pueblos Y Fronteras Digital, 9(17), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.22201/cimsur.18704115e.2014.17.66

Aguilar, Luis, 2007, «El aporte de la política pública y de la nueva gestión pública a la gobernanza», Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, n. 39, Caracas, pp. 1-15.

Birkenholtz, Trevor, 2011, «Network political ecology: Method and theory in climate change vulnerability and adaptation research», Progress Human Geography, v. 36, pp. 295-315.

Metha, Lyla, Melissa Leach, Peter Newell, Ian Scoones, Kalyanakrishnan Siravaramakrishnan y Sally-Anne Way, 1999, «Exploring understandings of institutions and uncertainty: new directions in natural resource management», IDS Discussion Paper 372, Environment group, Institute of Development Studies, pp.1-48.

Martín, Facundo, 2008, «Agua y modelo productivo. Innovaciones tecnológicas e impactos territoriales en el sistema agroalimentario de Mendoza», Estudios socioterritoriales. Revista de geografía, n. 7, pp. 26-45.

Montaña, Elma, 2013, Escenarios de cambio ambiental global, escenarios de pobreza rural. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

, «Vulnerabilidades pasadas y presentes de los productores agrícolas y ganaderos de la cuenca de Mendoza», en Vulnerabilidad al cambio ambiental global. Desafíos para la adaptación en las cuencas de Elqui y Mendoza, editado por Salas, Sonia, et al., Instituto Interamericano para la Investigación del Cambio Global, La Serena, pp. 59-74.

Mosse, David, 2006, «Collective action, common property and social capital in South India: an anthropological commentary» Economic Development and Cultural Change, v. 54, n. 3, pp. 695–724.

Nuijten, Monique, 2005, «Power in Practice: A Force Field Approach to Natural Resource Management», The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, v. 4, n. 2, pp. 1-14.

Ostrom Elinor y Edella Schlager, 1992, «Property rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis», Lands and Economics, v. 68, n. 3, pp. 249–262

Ostrom, Elinor, 2008, «Institutions and the environment» en The economic analysis of institutions. Blackwell Publishing. Oxford, pp. 24-31.

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.